Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Bruce H. ROSWICK (admitted as Bruce Harold Roswick) an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Bruce H. Roswick, Respondent.
Respondent Bruce H. Roswick was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 21, 1972 as Bruce Harold Roswick. At all times pertinent to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the First Judicial Department, seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a) on the ground that he has been automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a felony, as defined by Judiciary Law § 90(4)(e).
On January 30, 2003, respondent pled guilty to one count of repeated failure to file personal income and earnings taxes in violation of New York State Tax Law § 1802(a), a class E felony. Respondent was sentenced to five years probation, a fine of $30,000 (to be paid in increments of $6,000 a year), and signed a confession of judgment in favor of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance in the amount of $183,744.12. Respondent ceased to be an attorney by operation of law upon this felony conviction (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; see Matter of Cardali, 260 A.D.2d 65, 695 N.Y.S.2d 571 [1999] [automatic disbarment based on guilty plea to class E felony of commercial bribery in the first degree]; Matter of Rivers, 165 A.D.2d 649, 570 N.Y.S.2d 141 [1991] [automatic disbarment where felony conviction in violation of Tax Law § 1802] ).
Accordingly, the Committee's petition should be granted, and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys in the State of New York pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), nunc pro tunc to January 30, 2003, the date of entry of the judgment of conviction.
Respondent disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to January 30, 2003.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 07, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)