Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Douglas FAYTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered May 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts) and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him to two terms of 5 to 10 years, three terms of 2 to 6 years and a term of 1 year, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress a gun found during a search of an apartment shared by the complainant and defendant. The record supports the court's finding that the search was based on valid consent. The complainant, who had previously reported to the police that defendant had menaced her with a gun, informed the police that there was a gun in the apartment gave the gun's precise location and later expressly consented to a search of the apartment. The police properly relied on the complainant's apparent authority to consent to a search of her entire apartment, including the room in which defendant was located, there being no indication that the room was exclusively defendant's (see, People v. Figueroa, 267 A.D.2d 183, 700 N.Y.S.2d 676, lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 919, 708 N.Y.S.2d 358, 729 N.E.2d 1157). The record also supports the court's finding that the search was justified as an emergency action (see, People v. Adams, 236 A.D.2d 293, 654 N.Y.S.2d 130, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 854, 661 N.Y.S.2d 181, 683 N.E.2d 1055).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 17, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)