Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Proceeding, etc., CAROL S., Petitioner-Respondent, v. GERARD D., Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about March 22, 2000, which denied respondent's motion to dismiss this paternity proceeding on the ground of equitable estoppel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record in this paternity proceeding discloses that petitioner, respondent, petitioner's husband and the child have for some time shared the belief that respondent is the child's biological father; that maintaining the secret of her paternity has been stressful and frustrating to the teenage child who desires respondent to openly take responsibility for her paternity; and that, throughout the child's life, respondent has acquiesced in regularly visiting with and providing financial support for her. Under these circumstances, we perceive no reason to suppose that the child, who agreed to the commencement of this proceeding and whose best interests are of paramount importance (Richard B. v. Sandra B., 209 A.D.2d 139, 143, 625 N.Y.S.2d 127, appeal dismissed 87 N.Y.2d 861, 639 N.Y.S.2d 312, 662 N.E.2d 793), would suffer irreparable loss of status, destruction of her family image, or other harm to her physical or emotional well-being if this proceeding were permitted to go forward (cf., Ettore I. v. Angela D., 127 A.D.2d 6, 15, 513 N.Y.S.2d 733). Accordingly, respondent's motion to equitably estop petitioner from pursuing this proceeding was properly denied.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)