Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert Jamie LOWE, Claimant-Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Defendant-Respondent. (Claim No. 104523.)
Claimant, an inmate in a correctional facility, commenced this negligence and medical malpractice action alleging that defendant, State of New York (State), failed to diagnose and treat his bilateral cholesteatoma in a timely manner, resulting in permanent hearing loss in his right ear and significant impairment in his left ear. The Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim after trial. “[T]he State owes a duty to provide medical care and treatment to its prisoners, which duty has been defined in terms of both negligence ․ and medical malpractice” (Kagan v. State of New York, 221 A.D.2d 7, 16, 646 N.Y.S.2d 336). Under both theories, however, claimant must establish that the negligence of the State or the State's deviation from the accepted standard of care was the proximate cause of the claimant's injuries (see Bennett v. State of New York, 31 A.D.3d 1069, 820 N.Y.S.2d 653; Kagan, 221 A.D.2d at 11, 16-17, 646 N.Y.S.2d 336). Here, the court found that the State's delay in obtaining an ENT consult for claimant was unreasonable and not within the standards of accepted medical practice. The court further found, however, that the delay in treatment was not the proximate or aggravating cause of claimant's hearing loss. Contrary to claimant's contention, that finding is not against the weight of the evidence (see Burton v. State of New York, 283 A.D.2d 875, 877, 726 N.Y.S.2d 481).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 22, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)