Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Tammy A. McLEARY, Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court properly granted the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration. Respondent was injured when a boat slipped from a trailer on a boat launch adjacent to the boat launch where she was standing. Respondent observed the boat approaching and pushed it away from her, but she fell to the ground and injured her ankle. Although the trailer was attached to a vehicle, respondent left the scene without obtaining information concerning the vehicle. Respondent served a demand for arbitration of uninsured motorist benefits from petitioner, her insurer, whereupon petitioner commenced this proceeding.
The policy at issue defines an uninsured motor vehicle as one “for which ․ [n]either owner nor driver can be identified (including a hit-and-run vehicle)” and, in accordance with Insurance Law § 5217, the policy provides coverage for bodily injury caused by physical contact with an unidentified vehicle. “ ‘[P]hysical contact’ occurs within the meaning of the statute [ ] when the accident originates in collision with an unidentified vehicle, or an integral part of an unidentified vehicle” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Killakey, 78 N.Y.2d 325, 329, 574 N.Y.S.2d 927, 580 N.E.2d 399). Here, it cannot be said that the boat was an integral part of the vehicle (see Matter of Insurance Co. of N. Am. [Carrozo], 203 A.D.2d 210, 611 N.Y.S.2d 171; cf. Allstate Ins. Co., 78 N.Y.2d at 329-330, 574 N.Y.S.2d 927, 580 N.E.2d 399).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 22, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)