Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andre VEGA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.), rendered November 10, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second, third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 15 years to life, 1 to 3 years, 1 to 3 years, 1 year and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's repeated attempts to pull the trigger while the gun was pointed at the officer's face during the struggle over the gun tended to effect the commission of murder and also constituted reckless endangerment in the first degree (People v. Chrysler, 85 N.Y.2d 413, 626 N.Y.S.2d 18, 649 N.E.2d 1162). The totality of defendant's conduct satisfied the elements of these crimes as defined in the court's charge, read as a whole.
While the court, as requested by defendant, should have repeated, in its main charge, its preliminary instruction to the jury that the indictment is not evidence, reversal is not required. Our examination of the charge as a whole reveals that the jury was instructed that their verdict must be based solely on the testimony and physical evidence presented at trial (see, People v. Hurk, 165 A.D.2d 687, 560 N.Y.S.2d 144, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 1021, 565 N.Y.S.2d 772, 566 N.E.2d 1177).
Defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved because defendant made only general objections during the summation or, when objections were sustained, did not promptly request curative instructions or a mistrial (People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953, 441 N.Y.S.2d 442, 424 N.E.2d 276; People v. Johnson, 210 A.D.2d 174, 620 N.Y.S.2d 960, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 939, 627 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 651 N.E.2d 926), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that they would not warrant reversal.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 29, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)