Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Christopher WOJTOWICZ, An Infant, by James WOJTOWICZ, as Father and Natural Guardian, and James Wojtowicz, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEXTER TERRACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (BOCES), Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Christopher Wojtowicz (plaintiff), a 16-year-old student at the Dexter Terrace Learning Center, when he was assaulted by another student in his class. It is undisputed that the teacher was present in the classroom during the altercation and the events leading up to it. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs (see, Robinson v. Strong Mem. Hosp., 98 A.D.2d 976, 470 N.Y.S.2d 239), we find that there is an issue of fact whether the teacher was “ presented with a potentially dangerous situation and failed to take ‘energetic steps to intervene’ in time to prevent one student from injuring another” (Nelson v. Sachem Cent. School Dist., 245 A.D.2d 434, 435, 666 N.Y.S.2d 456, quoting Lawes v. Board of Educ., 16 N.Y.2d 302, 305, 266 N.Y.S.2d 364, 213 N.E.2d 667). The contention of defendant that it is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint because plaintiff voluntarily entered into the altercation is made for the first time on appeal and thus is not properly before us (see, Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984, 985, 609 N.Y.S.2d 745).
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 09, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)