Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
A. Arnold GERSHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fabianne Wolff GERSHON, Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Stackhouse, J.), entered August 7, 2003, awarding defendant $41,026.99, consisting of child support arrears and legal fees, upon a determination that plaintiff was in default for failing to pay 50% of the child's education and medical expenses, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated and the matter remanded for a hearing as to the credit plaintiff should receive for his contributions to child support, his share of medical expenses and total educational expenses, and any other expenses as contemplated by the parties in their separation agreement. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 24, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs, in view of the foregoing.
The motion court erred in deciding this apparent Domestic Relations Law § 244 motion by summarily determining plaintiff's liability for child support arrears instead of merely identifying issues for determination at a subsequent hearing (Hershkowitz v. Hershkowitz, 214 A.D.2d 303, 303-304, 625 N.Y.S.2d 886). The court's determination failed to resolve a number of issues, such as the credit plaintiff should receive for his contributions to child support, proper calculation of his share of medical expenses and total educational expenses, and proper calculation of his share of any other expenses as contemplated by the parties in their separation agreement. Furthermore, the judgment issued was inconsistent with the court's written decision and contained several additional errors and omissions (see Madison III Assocs. L.P. v. Brock, 258 A.D.2d 355, 685 N.Y.S.2d 239). Hence, vacatur of the judgment and remand to the motion court for a hearing are appropriate. Moreover, given that attorneys' fees were not awarded in the court's decision and that, as indicated, it is unclear whether defendant will prevail on the merits, the award of attorneys' fees is improper and should be vacated.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 25, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)