Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Arbitration between CITY OF UTICA, Respondent-Appellant, Anthony ZUMPANO, as President, Utica Professional Firefighters Association, Local 32, International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO-CLC, Appellant-Respondent.
Supreme Court erred in granting the petition, permanently enjoining arbitration demanded by respondent Anthony Zumpano, as President of the Utica Professional Firefighters Association, Local 32, International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO-CLC. The court erroneously relied upon Matter of Board of Educ. v. Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 40 N.Y.2d 268, 386 N.Y.S.2d 657, 353 N.E.2d 569 in holding that continuing to enforce minimum staffing and equipment provisions in the expired collective bargaining agreement between the parties violates public policy. After that case was decided, the Legislature, “which is also a source of public policy” (Matter of Board of Trustees [Maplewood Teachers' Assn.], 57 N.Y.2d 1025, 1027, 457 N.Y.S.2d 475, 443 N.E.2d 949, rearg. denied 58 N.Y.2d 824, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1030, 445 N.E.2d 657), enacted Civil Service Law § 209-a (1)(e). That subdivision provides that it is an unfair practice for a public employer to refuse to adhere to the terms of an expired agreement until a new agreement is negotiated. The only exception is when the public employees engage in a strike, which has not occurred here. Pursuant to the plain language of the statute, the minimum staffing and equipment provisions of the expired contract must remain in effect.
We reject the argument of petitioner that Civil Service Law § 209-a (1)(e) deprives it of its power of municipal home rule. The promotion of public “employer-employee harmony and uninterrupted service in the public sector by avoiding destructive self-help remedies” is a matter of State-wide concern (Association of Surrogates & Supreme Ct. Reporters Within City of N.Y. v. State of New York, 79 N.Y.2d 39, 45, 580 N.Y.S.2d 153, 588 N.E.2d 51).
Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 03, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)