Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Arbitration between MEDINA POWER COMPANY, Respondent, SMALL POWER PRODUCERS, INC., Appellant.
Supreme Court erred in granting petitioner's application for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503(b) permanently staying arbitration on the ground that a prior arbitration award is res judicata of the issues raised in the instant proceeding. The doctrine of res judicata applies only to issues resolved in the prior arbitration (see, Rembrandt Indus. v. Hodges Intl., 38 N.Y.2d 502, 504, 381 N.Y.S.2d 451, 344 N.E.2d 383); the parties are barred “from relitigating only those matters which were actually contested and therefore determined by the award” (Matter of Cine-Source, Inc. v. Burrows, 180 A.D.2d 592, 594, 581 N.Y.S.2d 9). In the instant proceeding, there are disputed factual issues whether respondent's entitlement to a termination charge under Article VI of the parties' agreement was resolved in the prior arbitration (see, Burbank Broadcasting Co. v. Roslin Radio Sales, 99 A.D.2d 976, 977, 473 N.Y.S.2d 13). Those issues are within the exclusive province of the arbitrator to resolve (see, Matter of City School Dist. v. Tonawanda Educ. Assn., 63 N.Y.2d 846, 848, 482 N.Y.S.2d 258, 472 N.E.2d 34; Matter of Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. v. Port Auth. Police Sergeants Benevolent Assn., 225 A.D.2d 503, 639 N.Y.S.2d 808; Lopez v. Parke Rose Mgt. Sys., 138 A.D.2d 575, 577, 526 N.Y.S.2d 156). We therefore vacate the permanent stay of arbitration and direct the parties to proceed to arbitration.
Order and judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, stay vacated and parties directed to proceed to arbitration.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 03, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)