Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David BARRY, Respondent, v. Ronald C. RICCIO, Appellant.
Appeal from a final judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Fifth District (James P. Flanagan, J.), entered March 29, 2005. The final judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded landlord possession and the principal sum of $3,600 in a nonpayment summary proceeding.
Final judgment affirmed without costs.
In February 2005, landlord commenced this nonpayment proceeding against tenant to recover, inter alia, $3,750 in unpaid rent for the period of August 20, 2004 through February 4, 2005. Following a trial, landlord was awarded possession and the principal sum of $3,600. The instant appeal by tenant ensued.
On appeal, tenant contends that, pursuant to CPLR 3217(c), the final judgment should be vacated and the petition dismissed in its entirety. Tenant argues that because landlord commenced two prior nonpayment proceedings against him in January 2005, seeking, inter alia, unpaid rents for the months of November 2004, December 2004 and January 2005, both of which proceedings landlord voluntarily discontinued, there was an adjudication on the merits as to the voluntarily discontinued second proceeding, which adjudication bars landlord from recovering rents in the instant proceeding.
Although it is uncontroverted that the prior proceedings were voluntarily discontinued, tenant failed to establish that the second proceeding was discontinued by notice, or by either a stipulation or an order providing that the discontinuance was with prejudice, so as to constitute a final adjudication on the merits against landlord (CPLR 3217[c]; see Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR C3217:15, at 748). Moreover, it appears from the record that the prior proceedings were discontinued due to procedural and pleading defects, and not out of any intent to harass tenant. In these circumstances, a discontinuance by means of notice would not operate as an adjudication on the merits (see e.g. Decarvalhosa v. Adler, 2001 N.Y. Slip Op. 40614[U], 2001 WL 1744163 [App. Term, 1st Dept.] ). Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 05, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)