Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Johnnie MAYNARD, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered August 21, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by appellant's brief, granted the motions of defendants New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint, alleging that the shooting of plaintiff's decedent by another passenger aboard one of defendants' buses was attributable to the negligence of the bus driver, was properly dismissed. Defendants assumed no special duty to assure the decedent's safety from the criminal acts of third parties, and, in the absence of such a duty, plaintiff may not recover from defendants on a negligence theory for the assault upon the decedent (Weiner v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141, 433 N.E.2d 124; Falcone v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Authority, 166 A.D.2d 271, 564 N.Y.S.2d 114). Moreover, even if defendants had had a duty to plaintiff's decedent and had been in breach of that duty, the armed assault upon the decedent constituted an intervening and superseding cause of the decedent's harm, and, as such, would cut off any liability on the part of defendants as a matter of law (see, Falcone, supra ). Plaintiff's new claim that defendants negligently failed to obtain prompt medical care for the decedent is not properly before this Court (see, Boland v. Koppelman, 251 A.D.2d 176, 674 N.Y.S.2d 349), and is, in any event, without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)