Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered February 23, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. When the police observed defendant engaging in suspicious behavior, including adjustment of his waistband, in a drug prone location, and observed a large bulge with the shape of a weapon in his waistband (see, People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 221, 386 N.Y.S.2d 375, 352 N.E.2d 562), they at least had a founded suspicion of criminality justifying a common-law inquiry. After they approached and got a better look at the bulge, they were convinced that it had the configuration of a machine pistol or large semiautomatic pistol (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 762, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380). Moreover, defendant refused to cooperate and reached toward his waistband (see, People v. Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267, 434 N.Y.S.2d 144, 414 N.E.2d 645). These factors amply provided reasonable suspicion, and at the very least permitted the police to touch the bulge (see, People v. Moret, 240 A.D.2d 321, 659 N.Y.S.2d 445, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 908, 663 N.Y.S.2d 520, 686 N.E.2d 232). The large brick of cocaine was only exposed during defendant's struggle with the officers which provided probable cause to arrest defendant and to seize what was apparently contraband. Accordingly, the physical evidence and statements were not fruits of an unlawful seizure.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)