Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Theodore SIMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered May 20, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of the crime charged and was not against the weight of the evidence. Three individuals testified to witnessing the actual shooting, two others witnessed the altercation leading up to the incident and defendant confessed to two others after the murder. Although defendant challenges the credibility of these witnesses, issues of credibility were properly presented to the finders of fact, who saw and heard the witnesses (People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94, 68 N.E. 112). And we see no reason to disturb their determination to accept the testimony of the prosecution witnesses.
By failing to object, or to request any further relief after an objection was sustained, defendant has failed to preserve his contentions with respect to the prosecutor's summation and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review such claims, we would find that although the prosecutor should not have made some of the comments about defendant's tattoo or commented on testimony previously stricken from the record, there was no pattern of inflammatory, prejudicial remarks warranting reversal (see, People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 591 N.Y.S.2d 1001, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 884, 597 N.Y.S.2d 945, 613 N.E.2d 977).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 17, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)