Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Milton J. WHITE and Kathleen J. White, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WOLCOTT MOBILE HOMES, INC., Defendant.
Wolcott Mobile Homes, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Geraldine JAY, d/b/a Jay's Construction, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)
Supreme Court erred in granting that part of plaintiffs' cross motion seeking summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action and denying those parts of the motion of defendant and cross motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing that cause of action. The alleged accident is not covered by that statute (see, Puckett v. County of Erie [appeal No. 1], 262 A.D.2d 964, 693 N.Y.S.2d 780).
The court properly denied, however, those parts of the motion of defendant and the cross motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241(6) cause of action. We modify the order, therefore, by granting those parts of the motion of defendant and the cross motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action. We dismiss the appeal from the order insofar as it granted in part plaintiffs' cross motion seeking summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action because that part of the order is subsumed in the judgment (see, Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988, 529 N.Y.S.2d 658; see also, Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608; CPLR 5501[a][1] ).
Appeal from order insofar as it granted in part plaintiffs' cross motion unanimously dismissed and order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)