Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SPECTRA AUDIO RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 60-86 MADISON AVENUE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered December 15, 1998, in favor of plaintiff sublessor and against defendant sublessee in the total amount of $70,262.42, and bringing up for review a prior order which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on its causes of action for unpaid rent and additional rent up to the making of the motion and for an account stated, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant plaintiff summary judgment dismissing defendant's affirmative defense of lack of authority, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to plaintiff payable by defendant.
Plaintiff was properly granted summary judgment on its cause of action for breach of the sublease upon a record showing that defendant's president had apparent authority to enter into the sublease on defendant's behalf, its attorney at the sublease closing having specifically represented to plaintiff that defendant not-for-profit corporation had taken all steps necessary to its entering into the sublease, including authorizing its president to execute the sublease on its behalf (see, Greene v. Hellman, 51 N.Y.2d 197, 204, 433 N.Y.S.2d 75, 412 N.E.2d 1301; Geotel, Inc. v. Wallace, 162 A.D.2d 166, 168, 556 N.Y.S.2d 577, lv. dismissed, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 917, 563 N.Y.S.2d 55, 564 N.E.2d 665). Defendant is, in any event, estopped from denying the validity of the sublease by reason of its subsequent six-month use and occupancy of the premises (see, Marine Midland Bank v. Russo Produce Co., 50 N.Y.2d 31, 44, 427 N.Y.S.2d 961, 405 N.E.2d 205). Inasmuch as the order did not directly dismiss the defense of lack of authority, we find it should be modified for purposes of clarity.
Summary judgment on the cause of action for an account stated was also properly granted based upon defendant's acceptance and retention of plaintiff's monthly rent bills, without objection, for five months (see, Ellenbogen & Goldstein v. Brandes, 226 A.D.2d 237, 641 N.Y.S.2d 28, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 806, 654 N.Y.S.2d 716, 677 N.E.2d 288). We have considered and rejected defendant's other claims.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)