Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application for the GUARDIANSHIP and Custody OF EMMANUEL B., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen years, etc., Cardinal McCloskey Services, Petitioner-Respondent, Jose M., Respondent-Appellant, Linda B. M., etc., Respondent. Pre-Adoptive Foster Parents.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about October 15, 1997, terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the subject child and committing the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, following a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supports the findings that petitioner agency made diligent efforts to strengthen respondent's parental relationship with the child, but that respondent repeatedly failed to attend scheduled visits with the child, and also failed to plan for the child's future by availing himself of services meant to help him obtain housing separate from the child's mother, whose mental illness made her unable to care for the child (see, Matter of Kimberly Rosemarie S., 211 A.D.2d 594, 621 N.Y.S.2d 614, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 809, 628 N.Y.S.2d 52, 651 N.E.2d 920). A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the child's best interests would be served by freeing him for adoption by his foster parents (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)