Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RESIDENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY ACTION (RICA), Daniel Beyer and Daniel O'Brien, Petitioners-Appellants, v. TOWN/VILLAGE OF LOWVILLE PLANNING BOARD and MJL Crushing, LLC, Respondents-Respondents.
Petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging the determination of respondent Town/Village of Lowville Planning Board (Board) approving the application of respondent MJL Crushing, LLC (MJL) for a special use permit to place a limestone mining operation in an agricultural zone. Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. “The classification of a particular use as permitted in a zoning district is ‘tantamount to a legislative finding that the permitted use is in harmony with the general zoning plan and will not adversely affect the neighborhood’ ” (Matter of Twin County Recycling Corp. v. Yevoli, 90 N.Y.2d 1000, 1002, 665 N.Y.S.2d 627, 688 N.E.2d 501, quoting Matter of North Shore Steak House v. Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston, 30 N.Y.2d 238, 243, 331 N.Y.S.2d 645, 282 N.E.2d 606). Contrary to petitioners' contention, the record supports the Board's determination that MJL demonstrated that the proposed mining operation is in conformance with the standards imposed by Article XII of the Town Code of the Town of Lowville with respect to special use permits, and we thus conclude that the application was properly granted (cf. Matter of Schadow v. Wilson, 191 A.D.2d 53, 57, 599 N.Y.S.2d 335; see generally Matter of Boyer v. Davenport, 304 A.D.2d 1028, 757 N.Y.S.2d 389, appeal dismissed and lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 601, 766 N.Y.S.2d 158, 798 N.E.2d 342).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)