Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel JACKSON, Appellant.
County Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant to an additional 61/212 to 13 years in prison because he failed to appear for sentencing after pleading guilty to criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.50[2] ) and two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16[1], [12] ). When it accepted the plea and released defendant from custody pending sentencing, the court informed defendant that it would impose a term of incarceration of 121/212 to 25 years if defendant did not return, and it does not appear that the court gave due consideration to the appropriate sentencing factors when it fulfilled that commitment (see, People v. Nicholson, 237 A.D.2d 973, 654 N.Y.S.2d 906, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 908, 663 N.Y.S.2d 520, 686 N.E.2d 232). The additional prison time based upon defendant's failure to appear exceeds the sentence for bail jumping in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.57). In our view, the sentence of 121/212 to 25 years imposed upon the conviction of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree is unduly harsh. We exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to reduce the sentence on those counts to concurrent indeterminate terms of incarceration of 7 to 14 years. We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 31, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)