Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Thomas KOZAKIEWICZ and Kathleen Kozakiewicz, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of B.M.K., an Infant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRONTIER MIDDLE SCHOOL, Frontier Central School District, Frontier Central School District Board of Education, Defendants-Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Plaintiffs commenced this action, individually and on behalf of their son, seeking damages for injuries sustained by their son when he was assaulted by a fellow eighth-grader following lunch recess. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Frontier Middle School, Frontier Central School District, and Frontier Central School District Board of Education (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Defendants met their initial burden by establishing that they did not have “sufficiently specific knowledge or notice of the dangerous conduct” that caused the injuries sustained by plaintiffs' son (Mirand v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.2d 44, 49, 614 N.Y.S.2d 372, 637 N.E.2d 263; see Murnyack v. Rebon, 21 A.D.3d 1406, 801 N.Y.S.2d 658; Taylor v. Dunkirk City School Dist., 12 A.D.3d 1114, 1115, 785 N.Y.S.2d 623), and plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Defendants presented evidence establishing as a matter of law that the student who assaulted plaintiffs' son had not engaged in any prior similar conduct with plaintiffs' son or any other student and thus that they could not reasonably have anticipated that plaintiffs' son would be assaulted by the fellow student (see Murnyack, 21 A.D.3d at 1406-1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 658; Taylor, 12 A.D.3d at 1115, 785 N.Y.S.2d 623). In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that defendants had the requisite knowledge or notice, we conclude that they further established that any negligence on their part based on their alleged lack of supervision was not a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiffs' son because “the assault occurred so suddenly that no amount of supervision would have prevented it” (Sanzo v. Solvay Union Free School Dist., 299 A.D.2d 878, 879, 750 N.Y.S.2d 252). We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 02, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)