Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James LANIER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered October 21, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). The element of serious physical injury (Penal Law § 10.00[10] ) was established by evidence that the victim's dental injuries caused a protracted impairment of his health, or of the function of a bodily organ. The injury caused pain, and difficulty in eating, for an extended period of time, and this impairment was still present at the time of the trial, over a year after the crime (see People v. Hall, 89 A.D.2d 788, 453 N.Y.S.2d 960 [1982] ). The evidence also supported the conclusion that defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim, which was the natural consequence of his conduct (see People v. Getch, 50 N.Y.2d 456, 465, 429 N.Y.S.2d 579, 407 N.E.2d 425 [1980]; People v. Caban, 306 A.D.2d 141, 760 N.Y.S.2d 321 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 618, 767 N.Y.S.2d 401, 799 N.E.2d 624 [2003] ). The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant struck the victim a hard blow in the face with a metal object. Moreover, the surrounding circumstances demonstrated that defendant had a motive to seriously injury the victim, and had actually threatened to do so.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)