Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gunther J. FLINN, Defendant-Appellant.
On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25[1] ), defendant contends that the plea was coerced by County Court's statements concerning the potential terms of incarceration in the event that defendant was convicted following a trial. Defendant failed to raise that contention in support of his motion to withdraw the plea, nor did he move to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground. Defendant thus failed to preserve his contention for our review (see People v. Carlisle, 50 A.D.3d 1451, 856 N.Y.S.2d 410, lv. denied 10 N.Y.3d 957, 863 N.Y.S.2d 141, 893 N.E.2d 447), but we nevertheless exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6] [a] ). At the plea proceeding, the court stated that it would treat defendant “very differently as far as the sentence is concerned” if he exercised his right to a trial and that his sentence after trial would be “nothing like the sentence that [he] would get if [he] stood up and accepted [his] responsibility.” The court further stated that defendant was “going to be sentenced [to] substantially longer than” the agreed-upon term of six years of imprisonment if he exercised his right to a trial. We agree with defendant that the court's statements do not amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences but, rather, they constitute impermissible coercion, “rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur” (People v. Fanini, 222 A.D.2d 1111, 635 N.Y.S.2d 896; see People v. Stevens, 298 A.D.2d 267, 268, 748 N.Y.S.2d 589, lv. dismissed 99 N.Y.2d 585, 755 N.Y.S.2d 721, 785 N.E.2d 743; People v. Wilson, 245 A.D.2d 161, 163, 666 N.Y.S.2d 164, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 946, 671 N.Y.S.2d 726, 694 N.E.2d 895). In light of our decision, we do not address defendant's remaining contentions.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 20, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)