Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carlos-Cesar GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maria PUCCIO, etc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered May 5, 2008, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On a prior appeal in this action (17 A.D.3d 199 793 N.Y.S.2d 382 [2005] ), we found that plaintiff, a teacher, stated a cause of action for defamation where he alleged that defendant Puccio told a student's parent that plaintiff had been accused of corporal punishment before. We noted that defendants' claims of truth and qualified privilege were affirmative defenses to be raised in the answer and that “[d]efendants may then move for summary judgment on any such defense available to them and, upon their making a prima facie showing of truthfulness or qualified privilege, the burden would shift to plaintiff” (id. at 201, 793 N.Y.S.2d 382).
Defendants' summary judgment motion included Ms. Puccio's unequivocal denial of making the subject statement, establishing a prima facie showing of a lack of the requisite publication of a defamatory statement (see Parker v. Cox, 306 A.D.2d 55, 759 N.Y.S.2d 678 [2003]; Snyder v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., 252 A.D.2d 294, 298, 684 N.Y.S.2d 235 [1999] ). In opposition, plaintiff failed to establish a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged statement was made and published (see id.; see also Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 [1986] ). Rather, plaintiff offered only hearsay, i.e., an out-of-court statement by the parent's mother that Ms. Puccio had made the alleged statement. The statement by the mother that Ms. Puccio made the statement was offered for its truth (i.e., that Ms. Puccio had made the statement). The only statement Ms. Puccio admitted making, that she told the parent that there were “problems” or “problemas” with plaintiff, was a true statement made in response to a direct question, without any elaboration, was not susceptible of a defamatory meaning and did not constitute defamation (see Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34, 38, 704 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1999] ). In any event, the statement would be protected by a qualified privilege, having been made by a high school principal to a student's parent who had a common interest in the subject matter of the conversation (see Garcia v. Puccio, 17 A.D.3d at 201, 793 N.Y.S.2d 382; Hoesten v. Best, 34 A.D.3d 143, 157-158, 821 N.Y.S.2d 40 [2006] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 26, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)