Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lamont HUBER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, as the Statutorily Designated Handgun Licensing Officer, and as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York and His Successors in Office, Respondent-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 25, 2006, which denied and dismissed the petition for an order pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition granted to the extent of directing respondent to issue purchase authorizations for 11 unlicensed firearms.
Petitioner sought to recover a collection of firearms removed by police from his mother's apartment after her death in the apartment from natural causes in March 2004. Eventually, petitioner moved by order to show cause pursuant to CPLR article 78 for an order directing respondent to grant him purchase authorizations for the 11 firearms held by the NYPD, or alternatively, directing respondent to release the firearms to a federally-licensed firearms dealer in New York City, who could subsequently transfer the firearms to a federally-licensed firearms dealer in Florida, for retrieval by petitioner's brother, a legal resident of Florida.
Under the peculiar facts of this case, we find that respondent conflated the concept of lawful possession under the Administrative Code of City of N.Y. (see Administration Code § 14-140; § 10-303; 38 RCNY 5-28[g],[j] ) with licensed possession. Given the uncontroverted fact that petitioner possesses the requisite pistol and rifle/shotgun permits, respondent has no grounds to deny petitioner the appropriate purchase authorizations. To hold otherwise would work a substantial and unjust forfeiture upon petitioner and his decedent mother's estate.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 25, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)