Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Yusef HENRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered January 5, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 1/414 to 10 1/212 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to submit criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included count of third-degree possession. Viewing the evidence most favorably to defendant, there was no reasonable view that he possessed the drugs without an intent to sell them (see, People v. Scarborough, 49 N.Y.2d 364, 369-370, 426 N.Y.S.2d 224, 402 N.E.2d 1127; see also, People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245, 525 N.Y.S.2d 7, 519 N.E.2d 808). Defendant engaged in an unmistakably sales-related conversation and course of conduct with an undercover officer, two other potential customers, and a supplier of drugs, whereupon other drug dealers interrupted the transaction and the undercover officer purchased from them instead. Moments later, defendant was arrested in possession of 48 crack vials, and there was no evidence suggesting possession for personal use.
The court properly declined to deliver a limiting instruction regarding defendant's drug-related conversation with the undercover officer during the course of the crime. This conversation constituted part of the instant crime and not an uncharged crime.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 25, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)