Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered April 28, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in restricting defendant's questioning of prospective jurors about their attitudes towards a psychiatric defense.
Based on the existing record, we find that defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584). While some of counsel's behavior was discourteous, it did not prevent defendant from receiving a fair trial.
The court properly permitted the prosecutor to introduce evidence of defendant's prior acts of abuse against the complainant as proof of his intent to commit attempted murder (People v. Saunders, 210 A.D.2d 164, 620 N.Y.S.2d 356, lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 1038, 623 N.Y.S.2d 194, 647 N.E.2d 466; People v. Dunston, 159 A.D.2d 387, 553 N.Y.S.2d 14, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 734, 558 N.Y.S.2d 896, 557 N.E.2d 1192; People v. Negron, 177 Misc.2d 851, 679 N.Y.S.2d 503).
Defendant's challenges to various portions of the testimony of the People's psychiatric expert are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged testimony was admissible as part of the expert's “ explanation reasonably serving to clarify his diagnosis and opinion” (CPL 60.55[1]; see also, People v. Wernick, 89 N.Y.2d 111, 116, 651 N.Y.S.2d 392, 674 N.E.2d 322).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 18, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)