Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward GARRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Donnino, J.), rendered December 17, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and two counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 12 1/212 to 25 years, and 12 1/212 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The multiple photo identification procedures were not inherently suggestive (see, People v. Chapman, 161 A.D.2d 1156, 555 N.Y.S.2d 514 lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 854, 560 N.Y.S.2d 993, 561 N.E.2d 893), and the fact that each viewing involved hundreds of photographs minimized the possibility of suggestiveness. The record supports the court's finding that a witness's identification of defendant was not influenced by the presence of the witness's father, a nonidentifying witness.
The court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion, which properly balanced the probative value of defendant's prior convictions against their prejudicial effect (see, People v. Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455, 459, 611 N.Y.S.2d 118, 633 N.E.2d 472; People v. Mattiace, 77 N.Y.2d 269, 275-276, 567 N.Y.S.2d 384, 568 N.E.2d 1189; People v. Pavao, 59 N.Y.2d 282, 292, 464 N.Y.S.2d 458, 451 N.E.2d 216).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)