Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COMMITMENT OF VIOLET CRYSTAL F., etc., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Catholic Guardian Society, Petitioner-Respondent, Peggy Frederick T., etc., Respondent, Britton Michael T., Respondent-Appellant.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about February 3, 1998, which, upon respondent's failure to appear at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated his parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of permanent neglect, and committed the children's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, and order, same court and Judge, entered on or about September 11, 1997, which denied respondent's motion to vacate his default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's motion to vacate his default was properly denied upon the ground that his claim that he was tending to his ailing father on the day of the hearings was not credibly substantiated (see, Matter of “Male” J., 214 A.D.2d 417, 625 N.Y.S.2d 179). Also unsubstantiated were respondent's claims that he regularly visited or attempted to visit the children. His claims that he was planning for the children's future were largely unresponsive to the proof adduced at the hearing. Ample evidence supports the findings that the agency made diligent efforts to strengthen respondent's parental relationship with the children, that respondent repeatedly failed to attend scheduled visits with the children and to cooperate with the agency's referrals for alcohol abuse, and that the children's best interests would be served by freeing them for adoption by their foster mother in whose care they have been since 1985, essentially their entire lives (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 143-144, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Aisha Latisha J., 182 A.D.2d 498, 582 N.Y.S.2d 408, lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 759, 591 N.Y.S.2d 137, 605 N.E.2d 873).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 23, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)