Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Balasubramanian RAJAGOPALAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered September 20, 2002, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The letter agreement under which plaintiff was appointed to a five-year term as associate professor is unambiguous, and its interpretation likewise presents a question of law for the court, to be made without resort to extrinsic evidence (West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Carter Paint Co., 25 N.Y.2d 535, 540, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449, 255 N.E.2d 709). Upon expiration of the specified period of employment, plaintiff “failed to demonstrate a limitation by express agreement on his employer's unfettered right to terminate at will” (Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, 69 N.Y.2d 329, 336, 514 N.Y.S.2d 209, 506 N.E.2d 919).
To incorporate the terms of an employee handbook into a contract of employment, the employee must demonstrate reliance upon its terms and resulting detriment (cf. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458, 465-466, 457 N.Y.S.2d 193, 443 N.E.2d 441). Plaintiff has established neither. His references to the faculty handbook include no mention of any express restriction on the right of termination (see Murphy v. American Home Prods. Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293, 305, 461 N.Y.S.2d 232, 448 N.E.2d 86). To the contrary, the handbook specifically provides that the departmental chair “may recommend reappointment for an additional five year term or not reappoint the individual to the faculty of Mount Sinai School of Medicine.”
Plaintiff received the full benefit of the promised employment for the stated five-year period, and has identified no breach of contract by defendants. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 11, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)