Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lyndon J. EVANS and Helen Evans, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim. Plaintiffs established that Lyndon J. Evans (plaintiff) was standing on the second highest step of a 10-foot unsecured stepladder while installing a water pipe at defendant's plant. As plaintiff began to descend the ladder, the ladder skidded, and plaintiff lost his balance and fell. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant's submission in opposition to the motion is in proper evidentiary form, we conclude that defendant failed to controvert those facts essential to establishing its liability under Labor Law § 240(1) and failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff's actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see, Szymanski v. Nabisco, Inc., 256 A.D.2d 1154, 1155, 684 N.Y.S.2d 122).
The court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiffs' motion to preclude defendant from using at trial surveillance tapes of plaintiff that were produced prior to the date of the court's order on plaintiffs' motion and a recorded statement of plaintiff made by defendant. Defendant failed to produce the surveillance tapes and the recorded statement in response to plaintiffs' discovery demands at times when defendant knew or should have known that they existed (see, Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 252 A.D.2d 946, 947, 675 N.Y.S.2d 734, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 817, 684 N.Y.S.2d 488, 707 N.E.2d 443). Thus, we modify the order by granting plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim.
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)