Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of NEW CREATION FELLOWSHIP OF BUFFALO, Petitioner-Respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW and Assessor of Town of Cheektowaga, Respondents-Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.).
Supreme Court properly granted the motion of petitioner seeking summary judgment and directing that respondents exempt petitioner from all ad valorem taxes for tax years 1998 and 1999 with respect to a parcel of vacant land purchased by petitioner. Petitioner is a religious corporation organized as a church under article 10 of the Religious Corporations Law, and the parcel of vacant land is adjacent to petitioner's existing parcel. Real Property Tax Law § 420-a (3)(a) provides a tax exemption for real property used for religious purposes, including vacant land, where “the construction of * * * buildings or improvements is in progress or is in good faith contemplated” by the religious corporation. Petitioner established its entitlement to a tax exemption under that section as a matter of law and respondents failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718). In support of the motion, petitioner established that the parcel has been used for religious purposes, i.e., as an additional parking area during church services, for outdoor prayer meetings, and as a play area for the children who attend the church. Petitioner further established that it has approved plans for improvements to the land and has begun to implement those plans by removing brush and debris from the parcel, grading the parcel, and removing an advertising sign. Thus, we conclude that petitioner is entitled to the tax exemption it seeks (see, Matter of Yeshivath Shearith Hapletah v. Town of Fallsburg, 79 N.Y.2d 244, 582 N.Y.S.2d 54, 590 N.E.2d 1182).
Amended order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)