Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of PELHAM MASONIC HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF CITY ISLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, For a Judgment, etc., v. The TAX COMMISSION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered June 25, 1998, which denied and dismissed petitioner's CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul and vacate respondent's determination denying petitioner an exemption from real estate taxes pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 420-b, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner, as the party seeking exemption from real property taxes, bore the burden of establishing its entitlement thereto (see, Matter of Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fin. Adm'r of the City of New York, 58 N.Y.2d 95, 99-100, 459 N.Y.S.2d 566, 446 N.E.2d 130). To satisfy that burden, it was required to demonstrate, inter alia, that its property was used exclusively for one or more of the exempt purposes set forth in the statute (see, Matter of Syracuse Council of Am. Youth Hostels v. Srogi, 116 Misc.2d 394, 395, 455 N.Y.S.2d 691, affd. 90 A.D.2d 674, 455 N.Y.S.2d 1018, lv. denied 58 N.Y.2d 606, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 447 N.E.2d 85). Given petitioner's failure to demonstrate it had actually used the subject property “exclusively” for an exempt historical purpose, or that it “owned” the property (Real Property Tax Law § 420-b[1][a] ), or that it was organized in good faith for historical purposes (Real Property Tax Law § 420-b[1][c] ), there was a rational basis for denial of an exemption (Matter of Mobil Oil Corp., supra; Matter of Pell v. Bd. of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 230-231, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 04, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)