Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of AMES DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., NO. 418, Petitioner-Respondent, v. ASSESSOR, BOARD OF ASSESSORS and Board of Assessment Review of Town of Greece and Town of Greece, Respondents-Appellants.
Supreme Court properly denied respondents' cross motion to dismiss three petitions seeking tax assessment review for 1995, 1996 and 1997. Petitioner, a fractional tenant occupying approximately 43% of a shopping plaza in the Town of Greece, is obligated under its lease to pay a proportionate share of the real property taxes. Petitioner is an aggrieved person within the meaning of Real Property Tax Law § 704(1) (see, Matter of Ames Dept. Stores v. Assessor of Town of Concord, 102 A.D.2d 9, 11, 476 N.Y.S.2d 222; see also, Matter of Big V. Supermarkets v Assessor of Town of E. Greenbush, 114 A.D.2d 726, 494 N.Y.S.2d 520) and has standing to maintain tax certiorari proceedings because its pecuniary interests are directly affected by the tax assessment and because the lease grants it the right to contest the taxes in its own name or in the name of the lessor (see, Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance Adm'r of City of N. Y., 74 N.Y.2d 128, 132, 544 N.Y.S.2d 561, 542 N.E.2d 1078; Matter of Ames Dept. Stores v. Assessor of Town of Concord, supra, at 10, 476 N.Y.S.2d 222). The provision in the lease granting petitioner the right to contest the tax assessment in the name of the lessor allows petitioner to assert the requisite “unitary property interest” (Waldbaum, Inc. v Finance Adm'r of City of N. Y., supra, at 134, 544 N.Y.S.2d 561, 542 N.E.2d 1078).
Petitioner and the lessor have equal standing to bring tax assessment review proceedings. The lease does not limit the grant of authority to petitioner, nor does it contain language from which it can be concluded that the lessor made a complete assignment of its right to seek tax assessment review. Because it was not a party to the agreement between the lessor and respondents in 1996, petitioner cannot be precluded by that agreement from maintaining these proceedings (see, Matter of Big V Supermarkets v. Assessor of Town of E. Greenbush, supra, at 728, 494 N.Y.S.2d 520).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)