Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pasquale MAZZARIELLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered July 28, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues concerning identification and credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94, 68 N.E. 112).
Defendant's public trial claim is both unpreserved and expressly waived, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. After defendant called a police officer as a defense witness, and the officer informed the court that he was performing undercover duties and wished the courtroom to be closed for his testimony, defendant expressly waived any objection. In any event, the court conducted a Hinton hearing nonetheless, and the officer's testimony sufficiently established a substantial probability that his safety and effectiveness could be prejudiced if he testified in open court (see People v. Ramos, 90 N.Y.2d 490, 662 N.Y.S.2d 739, 685 N.E.2d 492, cert. denied 522 U.S. 1002, 118 S.Ct. 574, 139 L.Ed.2d 413), notwithstanding that the instant robbery case had nothing to do with his undercover work. Contrary to defendant's argument, it is of no moment that the initial request for closure came from the officer himself rather than one of the parties.
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 15, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)