Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. James JOHNSON, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), entered on or about December 21, 2000, which granted defendant's motion to suppress certain physical evidence and a statement made to the police, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to suppress denied and the matter remanded for further proceeding.
The Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's suppression motion inasmuch as defendant's vehicle was properly stopped by the police after speeding and driving recklessly and the subject gun was properly recovered from the vehicle's glove compartment as part of a valid preliminary and limited inventory search at the scene (see People v. Robinson, 97 N.Y.2d 341, 348-349, 741 N.Y.S.2d 147, 767 N.E.2d 638; People v. Jackson, 279 A.D.2d 357, 358, 719 N.Y.S.2d 87, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 863, 730 N.Y.S.2d 37, 754 N.E.2d 1120; see also People v. Wright, 98 N.Y.2d 657, 746 N.Y.S.2d 273, 773 N.E.2d 1011). Since defendant was driving with a suspended out-of-state driver's license and could not produce registration papers for the vehicle, defendant was properly arrested, the vehicle impounded and its contents preliminarily inventoried at the scene (see People v Robinson, supra; People v Jackson, supra; People v. Dickens, 218 A.D.2d 584, 630 N.Y.S.2d 737, affd. 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 673 N.E.2d 1237). Since the search of the defendant's vehicle was proper, the Supreme Court similarly erred in suppressing defendant's subsequent statement to the police that he was a bodyguard and that he carried a gun for his own protection.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 24, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)