Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NADANIEL JACKIE P., also known as Nadaniel P., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Marie R., Respondent-Appellant, New York Foundling Hospital, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about November 10, 2004, which, upon a finding of mental illness, as defined in Social Services law § 384-b, terminated appellant's parental rights to the subject child, and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence established that appellant suffered from mental illness, as defined Social Services Law §§ 384-b(4)(c) and (6)(a). The agency presented uncontroverted testimony from a psychological expert who found that appellant suffered from schizoaffective disorder, and that that condition rendered her incapable of caring for the subject child then and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Emmanuel B., 277 A.D.2d 121, 715 N.Y.S.2d 699 [2000], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 704, 723 N.Y.S.2d 131, 746 N.E.2d 186 [2001]; Matter of Gilberto D., 207 A.D.2d 706, 616 N.Y.S.2d 593 [1994] ). Termination of appellant's parental rights was proper inasmuch as adoption represents the child's only prospect of a permanent, stable and nurturing familial disposition (see Matter of Monica Betzy D., 291 A.D.2d 289, 737 N.Y.S.2d 615 [2002] ) This is not a case in which adoption would, because of the age or opposition of the child, serve no useful purpose (compare Matter of Thomas M., 4 A.D.3d 137, 138, 771 N.Y.S.2d 514 [2004]; Matter of Miguel Angel Andrew R., 263 A.D.2d 354, 692 N.Y.S.2d 376 [1999] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 28, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)