Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DAVID H., A Person Alleged to be A Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrence McElrath, J.), entered on or about May 22, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent for committing acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and placed him with the Division of Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by vacating the finding of acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding of acts which would constitute attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672), including testimony that appellant had a defaced and loaded, but inoperable, handgun hidden on his person and then tried to discard it when he realized he was being followed by the police (see, Matter of Lavar D., 90 N.Y.2d 963, 965, 665 N.Y.S.2d 612, 688 N.E.2d 486; People v. Saunders, 85 N.Y.2d 339, 341–342, 624 N.Y.S.2d 568, 648 N.E.2d 1331), and the court, as fact-finder, was entitled to discredit appellant's testimony that, although he knew the weapon was loaded, he believed it to be inoperable (see, Matter of Isaac Q., 217 A.D.2d 410, 411, 629 N.Y.S.2d 37). However, the presentment agency failed to submit any evidence that appellant intended to use the handgun against another person, and such a finding is against the weight of the evidence, which shows that appellant found the gun only minutes before being confronted by the police and merely planned to take it home. Therefore, that portion of the petition charging acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is dismissed. Since appellant's placement has expired, there is no need for a remand for further dispositional proceedings.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 24, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)