Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LILIAN C., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN OF STEFANIE C., CLAIMANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (CLAIM NO. 127148.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the interlocutory judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Claimant commenced this action on behalf of herself and her daughter seeking damages for injuries that they sustained as passengers in a motor vehicle accident that occurred when the driver of another vehicle (nonparty driver) failed to yield the right-of-way and turned left in front of the vehicle that claimant and her daughter were in. Following a bifurcated nonjury trial on liability, the Court of Claims determined that defendant, State of New York (State), was 20% responsible and the nonparty driver was 80% responsible for the happening of the accident. Claimant appeals, and the State cross-appeals. We affirm.
The court concluded that the State failed to remedy a dangerous intersection condition, but the primary fault for the accident was the nonparty driver's failure to exercise enough caution under the circumstances. Contrary to the contentions of both claimant and the State, the court's apportionment of liability is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Destino v State of New York, 203 AD3d 1598, 1599-1600 [4th Dept 2022]; Johnson v State of New York, 151 AD3d 1672, 1673-1674 [4th Dept 2017]). We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
Entered: March 27, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 11
Decided: March 27, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)