Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. NICHOLAS M. MAHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [2]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable and that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We affirm.
Contrary to defendant's contention, a waiver of the right to appeal is not unconscionable per se (see People v Brinkman, 240 AD3d 1431, 1431-1432 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 1027 [2025]; People v Barr, 192 AD3d 1571, 1571 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 954 [2021]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 557-558 [2019], cert denied 589 US 1302 [2020]), and it is not improper for the People to demand a waiver of the right to appeal as a condition of a plea bargain (see Brinkman, 240 AD3d at 1431-1432; see e.g. People v Thomas, 237 AD3d 1557, 1557-1558 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 1059 [2025]; People v Giles, 219 AD3d 1706, 1706 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 1039 [2023]). Further, the record establishes that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Durinko, 239 AD3d 1347, 1348 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 993 [2025]; People v Brown, 229 AD3d 1150, 1150-1151 [4th Dept 2024]). The valid waiver encompasses defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Hoose, 236 AD3d 1294, 1296 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 993 [2025]).
Entered: March 20, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 85
Decided: March 20, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)