Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jacqueline M. Hansen BUKOWSKI, an attorney and counselor-at-law: Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, v. Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski (OCA Atty. Reg. No. 2478642), Respondent.
Respondent Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 13, 1992. At all relevant times, respondent maintained a registered business address in the First Judicial Department.
The Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) moves under the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) 1240.14(b) for an order suspending respondent due to a medical condition which has rendered her incapacitated from practicing law. Respondent, who is pro se, was personally served but did not respond or otherwise oppose.
In support of its motion, AGC asserts that it began investigating respondent, who is 83 years old, after receiving a complaint alleging she neglected a client matter. Between April 1 and September 9, 2025, AGC made several attempts to contact her for an answer to the complaint and subpoenaed her to appear for an examination under oath. Respondent failed to answer or appear. Instead, on September 29, 2025, respondent's spouse informed AGC that respondent suffers from dementia. On October 7, 2025, respondent's spouse submitted a letter from respondent's treating physician confirming respondent's diagnosis and asserting respondent “is under the care of a neurology team.” Respondent's physician concluded that respondent “does NOT have the capacity to practice law anymore.”
Upon due consideration, the Court concludes that AGC has presented sufficient evidence to show respondent's medical conditions has rendered her incapacitated from practicing law such that an indefinite suspension on medical grounds is warranted (see Matter of Etra, 238 A.D.3d 103, 233 N.Y.S.3d 32 [1st Dept. 2025]; Matter of Schneider, 235 A.D.3d 144, 228 N.Y.S.3d 62 [1st Dept. 2025]; Matter of Olive, 216 A.D.3d 59, 188 N.Y.S.3d 477 [1st Dept. 2023]).
Accordingly, AGC's motion should be granted, and respondent suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.14(b), effective immediately, and any disciplinary investigation or proceedings against respondent are stayed until further order of this Court.
Wherefore, it is Ordered that the motion by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department for immediate suspension, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.14(b), is granted, and respondent, Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York effective immediately, and until further order of this Court, and any disciplinary investigation or proceedings against respondent are stayed until further order of this Court; and
It is further Ordered that, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, respondent, Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) the practice of law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and
It is further Ordered that, respondent, Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15), which are made part hereof; and
It is further Ordered that if respondent, Jacqueline M. Hansen Bukowski, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith.
Per Curiam
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Motion No. 2025-05817
Decided: January 22, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)