Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David TAYLOR, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J., at suppression hearing; James Burke, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered March 15, 2022, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 559, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]). The record is clear that defendant understood the proceedings and that he had discussed his case with counsel, and counsel confirmed that he was confident defendant understood the waiver's implications, demonstrating “a full appreciation of the consequences of [the] waiver” (People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 [2011]).
Defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claims (see People v. Walker, 206 A.D.3d 541, 541, 168 N.Y.S.3d 820 [1st Dept. 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 1191, 176 N.Y.S.3d 221, 197 N.E.3d 501 [2022]). In any event, the court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the gun recovered from his waist. The police officers had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant based on the description provided in the radio call, as well as their observations and the face-to-face encounter with an informant, an MTA employee, who signaled towards her waist and said, “it's in his waistband” (People v. Ward, 161 A.D.3d 520, 521, 77 N.Y.S.3d 367 [1st Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 942, 84 N.Y.S.3d 869, 109 N.E.3d 1169 [2018]; People v. Brown, 288 A.D.2d 152, 152, 733 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1st Dept. 2001], lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 727, 740 N.Y.S.2d 700, 767 N.E.2d 157 [2002]). Further, the record supports the court's credibility determinations (People v. Diaz, 68 A.D.3d 642, 644, 894 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1st Dept. 2009], affd 15 N.Y.3d 764, 907 N.Y.S.2d 152, 933 N.E.2d 751 [2010]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 5350
Decided: December 11, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)