Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antonio MARTINEZ, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about August 17, 2023, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant has presented no basis which would warrant this Court exercising its discretion to grant defendant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his family support and participation in treatment and vocational programs, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument (see e.g. People v. Perez, 226 A.D.3d 487, 208 N.Y.S.3d 179 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 42 N.Y.3d 905, 2024 WL 4229156 [2024]; People v. Bevel, 224 A.D.3d 430, 204 N.Y.S.3d 103 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 42 N.Y.3d 902, 2024 WL 4125689 [2024]; People v. Mills, 220 A.D.3d 548, 199 N.Y.S.3d 22 [1st Dept. 2023], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 908, 2024 WL 2278702 [2024]). Defendant also failed to establish that his age reduced his risk of re-offense (see People v. Butts, 238 A.D.3d 520, 234 N.Y.S.3d 480 [2025]). Even if defendant is less likely to reoffend, a downward departure is unwarranted due to “the magnitude of harm that would result if he did reoffend” (People v. Etheridge, 149 A.D.3d 446, 446–447, 49 N.Y.S.3d 625 [1st Dept. 2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 912, 2017 WL 2467678 [2017]; see People v. Thomas, 202 A.D.3d 450, 451, 158 N.Y.S.3d 587 [1st Dept. 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 911, 2022 WL 2165460 [2022]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 5242
Decided: December 02, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)