Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Scott CRIPPEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. UNITED PETROLEUM FEEDSTOCKS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered July 18, 1997, which granted plaintiff employee's motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously modified, on the law, and the facts, to the extent of requiring plaintiff to post a bond in the amount of $10,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The restrictive covenant in issue, which provides that plaintiff “shall not ․ become or be interested in or associated with ․ any individual or entity ․ engaged in the oil brokerage business in ․ any country in which [defendant] or an affiliate thereof is then engaged in such business”, is unreasonably broad on its face both geographically and with respect to the types of positions plaintiff may not accept. We decline defendant's suggestion to modify the covenant so as to restrict plaintiff only from working for defendant's primary North American competitor, and to provide for defendant's continuing to pay plaintiff's base salary during the period of restriction. While such modifications might render the covenant enforceable (see, Maltby v. Harlow Meyer Savage, 166 Misc.2d 481, 633 N.Y.S.2d 926, affd. 223 A.D.2d 516, 637 N.Y.S.2d 110, lv. dismissed 88 N.Y.2d 874, 645 N.Y.S.2d 448, 668 N.E.2d 419), they would alter the original contract so drastically as to preclude a present finding that plaintiff would have accepted the contract under those terms; defendant should have drafted the agreement to include such provisions from the start and allowed plaintiff to decide whether to sign. However, it was error to grant the preliminary injunction without requiring plaintiff's posting of an undertaking (CPLR 6312[b] ), and we modify to require such in the amount we deem sufficient.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 16, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)