Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mbarek LAFREM, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Althea E.M. Drysdale, J.), entered on or about December 6, 2023, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion in declining a downward departure (see generally People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014]), and we perceive no basis to substitute our discretion and grant a downward departure to a level one adjudication. Contrary to defendant's assertion, the three-step Gillotti analysis properly implements the Guidelines and applies in full regardless of the applicability of an override (see e.g. People v. Williams, 238 A.D.3d 457, 457, 231 N.Y.S.3d 489 [1st Dept. 2025] [downward departure providently denied where the defendant was subject to an override to a presumptive risk level three and “(t)he risk assessment instrument adequately took into account mitigating factors (he) cited”]). Here, the mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately accounted for by the risk assessment instrument (see People v. Bevel, 224 A.D.3d 430, 431, 204 N.Y.S.3d 103 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 42 N.Y.3d 902, 2024 WL 4125689 [2024]; People v. Palmer, 166 A.D.3d 536, 537, 86 N.Y.S.3d 717 [1st Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 919, 2019 WL 1409867 [2019]), and his participation in sex offender treatment while incarcerated was not so exceptional as to warrant a downward departure (see People v. Alcantara, 154 A.D.3d 532, 532, 61 N.Y.S.3d 883 [1st Dept. 2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 908, 2018 WL 326534 [2018]).
In any event, the serious nature of defendant's crime, which involved him following a woman into a restroom at a nightclub after she refused to dance with him and brutally attacking her until she lost consciousness, outweighs any mitigating factors, as the egregiousness of his crime indicates a risk that reoffense would cause serious harm (see People v. Mills, 220 A.D.3d 548, 548, 199 N.Y.S.3d 22 [1st Dept. 2023], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 908, 2024 WL 2278702 [2024]; People v. Roldan, 140 A.D.3d 411, 412, 30 N.Y.S.3d 871 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 904, 2016 WL 5001245 [2016]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 5052
Decided: October 28, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)