Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: David MORAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 21, 2006, which denied petitioner's motion to vacate an arbitration award and granted respondent's cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner failed to meet his heavy burden of showing arbitrator misconduct or partiality by clear and convincing proof (see CPLR 7511[b][1] [i], [ii]; Matter of Dember Constr. Corp. [New York Univ.], 190 A.D.2d 537, 593 N.Y.S.2d 212 [1993] ). His claim that the arbitrator fell asleep during critical portions of the proceeding was contradicted by respondent's counsel, and there is no indication in the record that petitioner's attorney objected to the arbitrator's alleged dozing off. His claim that the arbitrator engaged in an ex parte communication with the complainant is unsupported by any evidence. Petitioner has not shown that the arbitrator's refusal to allow his lawyer to question the complainant as to any medication she may have been taking or to compel her to produce her diary resulted in the exclusion of material evidence (see Professional Staff Congress/City Univ. of N.Y. v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y., 39 N.Y.2d 319, 323, 383 N.Y.S.2d 592, 347 N.E.2d 918 [1976] ). Finally, the arbitrator's determination of petitioner's credibility based on his demeanor is beyond judicial review (see Matter of Haynes v. New York City Dept. of Homeless Servs., 27 A.D.3d 330, 332, 812 N.Y.S.2d 483 [2006] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 27, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)