Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Archie CULTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent, et al., Respondent.
On appeal from an order dismissing his petition to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to CPLR 7511, petitioner contends that the arbitrator exceeded her power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award could not be made. Petitioner is an employee of respondent New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) and was the subject of disciplinary proceedings for, inter alia, failing to comply with an order of a supervisor. Petitioner contended that the order was not lawful and requested arbitration. The arbitrator concluded that the order was proper and petitioner's failure to comply with it constituted a violation of section 2.5 of the DOCS Employees' Manual.
The determination of the arbitrator that the order was lawful is a determination that is beyond our review unless that determination violates public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a limitation placed on the arbitrator's power (see Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v. State of New York, 94 N.Y.2d 321, 326, 704 N.Y.S.2d 910, 726 N.E.2d 462). Petitioner does not contend that the determination violates public policy, and we conclude that the determination is rational and that the arbitrator did not exceed her power or imperfectly execute it when she disciplined petitioner for his failure to comply with that order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 19, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)