Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Elizabeth TAVAREZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 920 EAST 173RD STREET REALTY LLC et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Naita A. Semaj, J.), entered December 27, 2023, which, after an inquest following the grant of plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendants, directed judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $4,500 for pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the aggregate award to $50,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The award of damages for pain and suffering deviates materially from reasonable compensation to the extent indicated. Plaintiff presented evidence that she sustained fractures to the fourth and fifth metacarpal bones, which healed without surgery after being in a cast, but resulted in limitations in range of motion persisting over one year after the accident (see Vogel v. Cichy, 53 AD3d 877, 880–881 [3d Dept 2008]).
However, the court's finding that other conditions affecting plaintiff's hand, including nerve conditions, were not causally related to the trip-and-fall accident is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nightingale Rest. Corp. v. Shak Food Corp., 155 A.D.2d 297, 297 [1st Dept 1989], lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 702 [1990]). Plaintiff did not submit any direct evidence of her medical costs related to the accident, but only a Medicaid lien letter, and therefore the court could properly find that the evidence did not support an award for medical costs.
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4663
Decided: July 01, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)