Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Scott LEE and Dawn Lee, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Joseph M. STEARNS and Advantage Trucks & Salvage, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Joseph M. Stearns, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. O'Connell Electric Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)
We agree with defendant Advantage Trucks & Salvage, Inc. and defendant-third-party plaintiff Joseph M. Stearns (collectively, defendants) that Supreme Court erred in granting the cross motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment in part and dismissing the causes of action for contractual indemnification and breach of contract and in granting the subsequent cross motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for common-law indemnification. We therefore modify the order accordingly. Although the portion of the deposition transcript of Scott Lee (plaintiff) that is provided in the record establishes that plaintiff had just shoveled and salted the loading dock and “slipped and fell” while moving a welding machine, we note that plaintiff did not testify therein that he slipped on ice or snow. We thus conclude that there are issues of fact both with respect to defendants' alleged negligence and whether that alleged negligence was a proximate cause of the accident, precluding summary judgment (see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying in its entirety the cross motion with respect to the third-party complaint and the cross motion with respect to the cause of action for common-law indemnification and reinstating the third-party complaint and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)