Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David EKUKPE, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered December 16, 2022, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 years for attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and 2 to 4 years for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]), which forecloses review of his statutory speedy trial claim for his conviction under indictment No. 1511/2011 (see e.g. People v. Hall, 210 A.D.3d 482, 482, 176 N.Y.S.3d 480 [1st Dept. 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1078, 184 N.Y.S.3d 275, 204 N.E.3d 1057 [2023]; People v. Lara–Medina, 195 A.D.3d 542, 542, 145 N.Y.S.3d 804 [1st Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 993, 152 N.Y.S.3d 426, 174 N.E.3d 366 [2021]). The court properly explained the nature of the right to appeal, the claims that survive the waiver, and the distinction between the trial rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty and the waiver of the right to appeal as a condition of his plea agreement (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 [2011]). It is not dispositive that the court conducted this colloquy only after defendant's allocution (see e.g. People v. Bryant, 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096, 45 N.Y.S.3d 335, 68 N.E.3d 60 [2016]; People v. Nunez, 220 A.D.3d 597, 598, 197 N.Y.S.3d 61 [1st Dept. 2023], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 1004, 213 N.Y.S.3d 222, 236 N.E.3d 1240 [2024]), where, as here, “the record demonstrates that defendant had a full appreciation of the consequences of the waiver and that the waiver was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances” (People v. Cassanova, 234 A.D.3d 622, 226 N.Y.S.3d 64 [1st Dept. 2025] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Castillo, 226 A.D.3d 573, 574, 207 N.Y.S.3d 525 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 41 N.Y.3d 1017, 214 N.Y.S.3d 306, 237 N.E.3d 1246 [2024]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3936
Decided: March 18, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)