Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andre FERNANDEZ, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J., at suppression hearing; Dominic Massaro, J., at trial and sentencing), rendered July 15, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive prison terms of 25 years to life, and order, same court (John Carter, J.), entered on or about December 21, 2021, which denied his CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant received effective assistance of counsel under the state and federal standards (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713–714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998]; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984]). Defendant has not shown that any of counsel's alleged deficiencies fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, or that they were prejudicial under either of those standards. Further, counsel would not have prevailed had he investigated or made the additional suppression arguments that defendant faults counsel for failing to make (see People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 287, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 [2004]). Although defendant used drugs and had psychiatric problems, those issues were not likely to undermine a finding of voluntariness here, where the videotaped statement itself provided the most direct evidence of defendant's voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights (see People v. Munoz, 134 A.D.2d 532, 533, 521 N.Y.S.2d 299 [2d Dept. 1987], lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 958, 525 N.Y.S.2d 842, 520 N.E.2d 560 [1988]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3908-, 3908A
Decided: March 18, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)